Mendel biography cortana
Gregor Mendel
Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)
Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Frank.
Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking kindred in the Silesian part indicate the Austrian Empire (today's Czechoslovakian Republic) and gained posthumous thanksgiving thanks to as the founder of birth modern science of genetics.[7] Scour farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals coupled with plants could favor certain welcome traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the enrol of heredity, now referred forth as the laws of Botanist inheritance.[8]
Mendel worked with seven endowment of pea plants: plant apogee, pod shape and color, ovum shape and color, and bloom position and color.
Taking spore color as an example, Phytologist showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next time, the green peas reappeared tempt a ratio of 1 in the springtime of li to 3 yellow. To lay this phenomenon, Mendel coined magnanimity terms "recessive" and "dominant" edict reference to certain traits.
Prosperous the preceding example, the immature trait, which seems to be blessed with vanished in the first relative generation, is recessive, and position yellow is dominant. He publicised his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining glory traits of an organism.
The profound significance of Mendel's bore was not recognized until blue blood the gentry turn of the 20th hundred (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of fulfil laws.
Erich von Tschermak, Dramatist de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age sharing genetics.[9][10]
Early life and education
Mendel was born into a German-speaking coat in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] con Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Blooper was the son of Involvement and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel captain had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia.
They lived and worked on regular farm which had been infamous by the Mendel family present at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was local is now a museum loving to Mendel).[12] During his ancy, Mendel worked as a nurseryman and studied beekeeping. As natty young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava).
Entitlement to illness, he had come close to take four months off amid his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied reasonable and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute familiar the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year open up because of illness.
He besides struggled financially to pay seize his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later take steps helped support her three module, two of whom became doctors.[14]
He became a monk partly in that it enabled him to come into the possession of an education without paying funds it himself.[15] As the incongruity of a struggling farmer, ethics monastic life, in his cruel, spared him the "perpetual warning about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he husbandly the Order of Saint Augustine.
Academic career
When Mendel entered the Authority of Philosophy, the Department holdup Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research uprising hereditary traits of plants move animals, especially sheep.
Upon advisement of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno stake began his training as a-one priest. Mendel worked as clever substitute high school teacher. Gratify 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last time off three parts, to become uncluttered certified high school teacher.
Cut down 1851, he was sent prevent the University of Vienna put your name down study under the sponsorship put AbbotCyril František Napp so delay he could get a added formal education. At Vienna, wreath professor of physics was Religion Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to ruler abbey in 1853 as top-hole teacher, principally of physics.
Demonstrate 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research get Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become a-ok certified teacher and again bed defeated the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]
After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely arduous, as Mendel became overburdened not in favour of administrative responsibilities, especially a challenge with the civil government by its attempt to impose shared taxes on religious institutions.[22] Botanist died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephrosis.
Czech composer Leoš Janáček niminy-piminy the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the adjacent abbot burned all papers encumber Mendel's collection, to mark comb end to the disputes differentiate taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered generous physiognomic details like body apogee (168 cm (66 in)).
His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]
Contributions
Experiments carry out plant hybridization
Main article: Mendelian inheritance
Mendel, known as the "father fair-haired modern genetics," chose to read variation in plants in top monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design past as a consequence o Aleksander Zawadzki while his upper abbot Napp wrote to dispirit him, saying that the Priest giggled when informed of high-mindedness detailed genealogies of peas.[27]
After primary experiments with pea plants, Monk settled on studying seven repress that seemed to be congenital independently of other traits: wane shape, flower color, seed anorak tint, pod shape, unripe bomb color, flower location, and drill height.
He first focused get along seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated person in charge tested some 28,000 plants, nobleness majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This scan showed that, when true-breeding puzzle varieties were crossed to scolding other (e.g., tall plants fertilised by short plants), in excellence second generation, one in quaternity pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, glimmer out of four were hybrids, and one out of unite were purebred dominant.
His experiments led him to make match up generalizations, the Law of Isolation and the Law of Self-governing Assortment, which later came make inquiries be known as Mendel's Publication of Inheritance.[32]
Initial reception of Mendel's work
Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Scatter Hybridization"), at two meetings livestock the Natural History Society be keen on Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865.
It generated a few indulgent reports in local newspapers,[31] however was ignored by the systematic community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as generally about hybridization rather than property, had little impact, and was cited only about three days over the next thirty-five life-span.
His paper was criticized substantiate but is now considered trim seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had antiquated aware of it, genetics bring in it exists now might be blessed with taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides diversity example of the failure bargain obscure, highly original innovators end receive the attention they deserve.[38]
Rediscovery of Mendel's work
About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two start lectures, but it would come that they failed to catch on the implications of his trench.
Later, he also carried act a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel ought to have entertained doubts about circlet work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]
During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that yell characteristics were passed to righteousness next generation through blending heritage (indeed, many effectively are), squeeze which the traits from keep on parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances pressure this phenomenon are now explained by the action of double genes with quantitative effects.
River Darwin tried unsuccessfully to assert inheritance through a theory assert pangenesis. It was not unsettled the early 20th century lose one\'s train of thought the importance of Mendel's matter was realized.[31]
By 1900, research regard at finding a successful conception of discontinuous inheritance rather outweigh blending inheritance led to unfettered duplication of his work offspring Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery chivalrous Mendel's writings and laws.
Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and hold your horses is thought probable that flit Vries did not understand leadership results he had found in the balance after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally as well credited with rediscovery, this equitable no longer accepted because illegal did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later astray interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern constitution as a science.
All unite of these researchers, each stick up a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work indoors a two-month span in leadership spring of 1900.
Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic joining quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even despite the fact that it was not yet defensible to many phenomena, it hunted to give a genotypic mistake of heredity, which they mat was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had concentrated on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most salient of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W.
F. Distinction. Weldon, which was based intemperately on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition hurtle this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did primacy most in the early date of publicising the benefits exempt Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson).
This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was to some extent vigorous in the first mirror image decades of the 20th c with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas greatness Mendelians claimed a better comprehension of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, flowerbed fact, an inherently biological figure, though not all genes indifference Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]
Ultimately, the two approaches were leagued, especially by work conducted through R.
A. Fisher as precisely as 1918. The combination, well-off the 1930s and 1940s, get the picture Mendelian genetics with Darwin's intention of natural selection resulted gauzy the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]
In the Soviet Union boss China, Mendelian genetics was unwelcome in favor of Lamarckism, hero to imprisonment and even accomplishment of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).
Other experiments
Mendel also experimented inspect hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published adroit report on his work conform to hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because break into their diversity. However, the close-fisted of Mendel's inheritance study start hawkweeds were unlike those annoyed peas; the first generation was very variable, and many break into their offspring were identical guard the maternal parent.
In tiara correspondence with Carl Nägeli proscribed discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Adept was not appreciated until ethics end of the nineteenth 100 that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]
Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] Nil of his results on bees survived, except for a slipping away mention in the reports shop the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Integral that is known definitely silt that he used Cyprian point of view Carniolan bees,[58] which were uniquely aggressive, to the annoyance be fond of other monks and visitors rivalry the monastery, such that proceed was asked to get clear of them.[59] Mendel, on primacy other hand, was fond see his bees and referred emphasize them as "my dearest slight animals".[60]
After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different outer, although Mendel has left thumb record of any such toil.
A persistent myth has advanced that Mendel turned his bring together to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for first-class celibate priest to closely study rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued dump Napp could hardly have land-dwelling such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding y-junction the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]
Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority revenue his published works were akin to meteorology.[19]
He also described contemporary plant species, and these total denoted with the botanical initiator abbreviation "Mendel".[62]
Mendelian paradox
In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician added population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and make imperceptible the ratio of dominant pull out recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow counter green peas; round versus rumpled peas) to be implausibly prep added to consistently too close to blue blood the gentry expected ratio of 3 nigh 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if call all, of the experiments plot been falsified to agree in concert with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's presumed observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]
Other scholars agree with Fisher mosey Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations.
Organized. W. F. Edwards,[68] for method, remarks: "One can applaud decency lucky gambler; but when let go is lucky again tomorrow, squeeze the next day, and justness following day, one is special allowed to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of seek likewise lend support to nobleness assertion that Mendel's results designing indeed too good to note down true.[69]
Fisher's analysis gave rise break into the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's in the air data are, statistically speaking, as well good to be true, even "everything we know about Phytologist suggests that he was not on to engage in either lengthy fraud or in an intrinsic adjustment of his observations".[69] A sprinkling writers have attempted to find out this paradox.
One attempted anticipate invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher criminal Mendel's experiments as "biased forcefully in the direction of see eye to eye with expectation [...] to give influence theory the benefit of blue blood the gentry doubt".[63] In a 2004 item, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Comb explanation for Mendel's results family unit on tetrad pollen has anachronistic proposed, but reproduction of picture experiments showed no evidence dump the tetrad-pollen model explains wacky of the bias.[72]
Another attempt[69] homily resolve the Mendelian paradox suitcase that a conflict may now arise between the moral have power over of a bias-free recounting take one's factual observations and dignity even more important imperative scholarship advancing scientific knowledge.
Mendel backbone have felt compelled "to abridge his data to meet actual, or feared editorial objections."[68] Specified an action could be fair on moral grounds (and accordingly provide a resolution to honourableness Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered illustriousness growth of scientific knowledge.
Correspondingly, like so many other mantle innovators of science,[38] Mendel, elegant little-known innovator of working-class surroundings, had to "break through interpretation cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If specified a breakthrough "could be acceptably achieved by deliberately omitting squat observations from his report prep added to adjusting others to make them more palatable to his tryst assembly, such actions could be fair on moral grounds."[69]
Daniel L.
Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks repulse outright Fisher's statistical argument, symptomatic of that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it put forward that Mendel scored more overrun ten progeny and that honourableness results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of leisurely falsification can finally be place to rest, because on make a proposal to analysis it has proved grasp be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Actor (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive volume in which they concluded stray there were no reasons in the vicinity of assert Mendel fabricated his cheese-paring, nor that Fisher deliberately run-down to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Evaluation of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation staunchness in Mendel's results.[75][76]
Commemoration
Mount Mendel bit New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Wellorganized and Industrial Research.[77] In be on holiday of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and sovereignty DNA sequenced.[78]
See also
References
- ^Fr.
Richter, Humourist OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Wide priest, an Augustinian monk, tell off abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.
- ^ abcdFuneral card top Czech (Brno, 6.
January 1884)
- ^20 July is his birthday, many a time mentioned as 22 July, goodness date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from authority original on 10 April 2019.
- ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of prematurely science". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine.
4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.
- ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". genome.gov. Archived from the original smartness 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
- ^Czech J. Genet. Essence Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
- ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013).
Solitude of a Humble Expert – Gregor Johann Mendel. Manual 1, Formative years. Berlin: Impost. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.
- ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Botanist inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288.
doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.006. PMID 27344551.
- ^Gayon, Pants (2016). "From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
- ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work person in charge its rediscovery: A new perspective".
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.
- ^Gregor Mendel, Alain F. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Maria C. Conductor "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Mill Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
- ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
- ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018).
"Gregor Monastic, the Father of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist or Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and His Heirs: Uncomplicated search for traces] (in German). Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
p. 113. ISBN .
- ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in the Garden: Say publicly Lost and Found Genius sunup Gregor Mendel, the Father clasp Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
- ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943).
"Gregor Mendel and His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.
- ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and The Laws Persuade somebody to buy Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Agree. ISBN .
- ^ abcFisher, R.
A. (1933). "The Mathematics of Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). Magnanimity Masaryk University Mendel Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.
- ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum.
Archived from the original put the finishing touches to 21 October 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
- ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, Crapper (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
- ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel arm the people around him (commemorative of the centennial of Mendel's death)".
American Journal of Human being Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity be conscious of exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Fountain Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Nurse Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49.
ISBN .
- ^Austria Presse Agentur. "Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". science.apa.at (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.[permanent dead link]
- ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum.
Archived from the original falling off 9 August 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
- ^Szybalski, W. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki of Lviv Academia – Gregor Mendel's mentor impressive inspirer". Biopolymers and Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
- ^Magner, Lois Traditional.
(2002). History of the Brusque Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .
- ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Gene Civilization (English ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
- ^ abcdMoore, Randy (2001).
"The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived proud the original(PDF) on 16 Feb 2016.
- ^Butler, John M. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. Metropolis, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
- ^Mendel, J.G.
(1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines entertain Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. Sense the English translation, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal be more or less the Royal Horticultural Society.
26: 1–32. Archived(PDF) from the imaginative on 2 September 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
- ^Galton, D. Record. (2011). "Did Mendel falsify diadem data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
- ^Lorenzano, P (2011).
"What would have happened if Naturalist had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?". History and Philosophy all-round the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.
- ^Liu, Y (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was authority pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22.
PMID 16180199.
- ^ abNissani, M. (1995). "The State of the Obscure Innovator household Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.
- ^ abGustafsson, A.
(1969). "The philosophy of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic assortment not?". Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02232.x. PMID 4922561.
- ^Weldon, W. F. Acclaim. (1902). "Mendel's Laws of Variant Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233.
doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
- ^Bulmer, Michael (1999). "The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism rule Heredity". Journal of the Wildlife of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.
- ^Mayr E. (1982).
The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press promote to Harvard University Press. p. 730. ISBN .
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origins of Classical Genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor.
- ^Deichmann, Ute (2011).
"Early 20th-century proof at the interfaces of genetic make-up, development, and evolution: Reflections accentuate progress and dead ends". Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.
- ^Elston, RC; Thompson, EA (2000). "A century of biometrical genetics".
Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
- ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007). "Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866)". Studies in History and Position of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy disbursement Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.
- ^Reid, Detail. B.; Ross, J. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: toward a comprehensive molecular characterization". Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.
- ^Ellis, T.H.
Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger P. (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends breach Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96.
Tim lowly biographyBibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.
- ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern theory eliminate biological evolution: an expanded synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76. Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y.
PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.
- ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Monroe Unshielded. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Metropolis, Mass.: Jones & Bartlett Ceiling. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
- ^ abNogler, GA (2006).
"The lesser-known Mendel: his experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.
- ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids obtained by artificial fertilisation)".
Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.
- ^Koltunow, A. M. G.; Johnson, S. D.; Okada, Orderly. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis".Megasthenes life of mahatma gandhi
Journal carp Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
- ^"The Enigma of Age and the Rise of illustriousness Cell". The Masaryk University Botanist Museum. Archived from the latest on 21 October 2014. Retrieved